knowledge of rock climbing activities in the Omak area dates back to the
early 1970s. Undoubtedly, mountaineers seeking practice rocks, or
wandering cragsmen looking for solitude poked about the cliffs before then,
but none of them published their activities; indeed, none left any written
note, old piton, nor even a tattered rappel sling that future climbers have
been able to find. We presume their visits were rare.
Typical of American climbers in the ’70s, these climbers were heavily influenced by an expanding ecological consciousness that affected most of us at that time. Not only with regard our earthly environment in general, but also in the preservation and protection of the crags, a new attitude was reaching national popularity. With an ethical system supported and fueled by the now famous 1972 Chouinard catalogue, this group of climbers adopted the strictest (cleanest) of “clean climbing” philosophies: no bolts, no pitons, no aid climbing. If a route couldn’t be climbed free with nuts, it was to be left to the birds and the chipmunks.
Also, a strict no publicity maxim was enforced: no guidebooks, no magazine articles; one was even to be careful talking about the climbs. For the most part, these climbers believed they were here to respectfully share this scared ground with the spirits of the earth, and this sense of respect included a strong conviction that broader visitation by outside climbers would only foul the nest. Although these ethics may now seem a bit extreme and counterproductive, one could consider they sprung from at least three rational concepts: “territorial imperative”–the local climbers grew up with this as their backyard; “ecological logic”– fewer climbers equals less environmental impact; and (to quote Chuck Pratt’s advice), “keep your mouth shut” when you ‘find’ a new climbing area – what really is to be gained when you tell everybody?
And so the 70s unfolded as a period of daring climbs, few climbers and many adventures. Numerous first ascents were not recorded. Paul Gleason, a protégée of John Gill and a mentor for John Long, was most likely at his bouldering and free soloing apex when he climbed around Omak. But he kept quiet about his bold ascents. Other members of this group also ventured up onto unknown territory.
Of the many brave outings during that era, one remarkable ascent, the west face of the Lake Wall (AKA Eagle Cliff) deserves mentioning. Jim and John Goss, with a handful of homemade nuts and a single rope, headed up this muti-pitch route to overcome difficulty and danger with courage and skill instead of technology and tools. This exploration stands as a signature climb of an adventurous spirit that would all but disappear as an approach to the climbing of these rocks.
The 1980s brought at least two new teams to the Omak area: Mitch Merriman/Herman Harrison and Bruce Tracy/Phil Gleason. As young climbers, Mitch and Herm were active in the Omak area as well as elsewhere in Washington. Mitch in particular (often with other novice climbers) started his climbing career in the Okanogan County. As often happens with beginner rock climbers who learn climbing through their own discovery, Mitch had many close calls and exciting adventures.
Mitch contributed the following in a recent e-mail:
I started climbing in the Omak crags in the summer of 1982, mostly top roping and rappelling shenanigans such as befitted my lack of training. I knew how to tie a water knot, figure eight knot and a double fisherman’s knot and I knew how to hip belay and rappel with a carabineer brake (4-oval carabineers) and whatever else I could glean from the pages of Mountaineering: Freedom of the Hills. My gear consisted of an 11mm x 45m rope, two locking Carabineers, four oval carabineers, 12 feet of 1” tubular [webbing] that I tied leg loops in and wrapped the rest around my waist for a harness, and 30 feet of 1” tubular for rigging anchors (slinging boulders, Ponderosa Pine trees, mock orange, serviceberry shrubs or equalizing sagebrush bushes). My shoes were leather hi-top converse basketball shoes that I would periodically sew the soles back onto with dental floss. I and whoever I could trick/coerce into it would top rope mostly on what I believe is now called “The Practice Wall.” They were fifteen foot routes from 5.2 to 5.9. I took an unroped fall while soloing in a 5.2 chimney…the first time of many in which I really should have died.
Mitch survived the incident and added many fine climbs in the area, generally in the moderate to 5.9+ range. He and a variety of partners were quite active. Mitch and Michael Patterson climbed “Danison’s Delight,” in 1984. Mitch and Herman Harrison climbed “Linear Perversions,” aka “Spill the Wine” on Omak Lake Wall in 1986. Mitch and Tom Bosden climbed a five-pitch route, “Mitch and Tom’s Excellent Rock Climb” (5.8) on the Mission Wall in 1989, and with Tom Bowden he climbed another five pitch line on Eagle Cliff (5.9+) also in 1989.
Editor’s note: readers who climbed in the early ’80s may recall this as the scariest rating ever before or since given in American climbing. 5.9+ was reserved for routes that were of un-quantified difficulty, obviously hard and at or near the top end of what any local climber could do at the time. There was an ideological aversion to extending the difficulty scale beyond 5.9 because it was originally conceived of as a decimal system, and 5.9 had been defined as the hardest possible climb that could be done without aid. 5.10 didn’t make sense; after 5.9 came Class 6, which was aid. The rating “5.9+” often went without update because many of these 5.9+ climbs were obscure or exceedingly run out in addition to being just plain hard; many popular routes in this range eventually were re-rated at 5.10 or 5.11.
1 | 2 | Next>>
|©2004 Northwest Mountaineering Journal|
|Site design by Steve Firebaugh|